Quality Process
PSI’s quality tracking system centers on “Redbooks” - a homegrown issue tracking system used across all departments.
The Redbook System
What is a Redbook?
A Redbook is PSI’s internal term for a quality issue ticket. When someone discovers a problem during design, build, or field installation, they open a redbook.
Name Origin: The original system used physical red notebooks where issues were logged by hand. The digital system inherited the name.
Interfaces
| Interface | URL | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Redbook Web | https://redbook.progressivesurface.com | Modern web app for RFC management |
| WPF App | Desktop (PSI.Redbook.View) | Legacy desktop application |
| Analytics Dashboard | https://ps-redbook-dashboard.azurewebsites.net | Analysis and reporting |
See Redbook Web for the modern web interface documentation.
When to Open a Redbook
Open a redbook when you discover:
- Drawing errors (typos, missing dimensions, wrong tolerances)
- Design function issues (interference, undersized components)
- Vendor quality problems (parts don’t meet spec)
- Assembly errors (wiring mistakes, fitment issues)
- Field problems (issues found at customer site)
Redbook Lifecycle
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Opened │────▶│ In Progress │────▶│ Closed │
│ (Issue found)│ │ (Being fixed)│ │ (Resolved) │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Opener Dept assignments Resolution
records track who's documented
details working on it
Key Redbook Fields
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| ID | Unique ticket number |
| Project | Job number |
| Problem | Description of the issue |
| Drawing | Related drawing number |
| Priority | Urgency level (1-High to 4-None) |
| Dept flags | Which departments are assigned |
| ECN/NCN | Linked change documents |
| Account | Customer account (from ACCOUNT.1287) |
| Primary Resp | Responsible cost center (from COCE) |
| Activity | Activity log with timestamps |
| Solution | Solution description |
| Opportunity | Waste metrics (material $, labor hours) |
Detection Timing
When an issue is found significantly impacts the cost to fix it. PSI categorizes detection timing as:
| Stage | Days Before Ship | Multiplier | Typical Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early | >90 days | 1.0x | Design review, early build |
| Mid-Build | 30-90 days | 1.25x | Assembly, initial testing |
| Late Build | <30 days | 1.5x | Crunch time fixes |
| Near/At Ship | ~0 days | 2.0x | Last-minute discoveries |
| Post-Ship | After ship | 2.0x | Field escapes |
Caveat: This uses planned ship dates. Projects that ship late may show issues as “Post-Ship” even if caught in-house.
Quality Metrics
Key Performance Indicators
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Quality % | Quality Cost / Project Value | <2% |
| Early Detection Rate | % issues found >90 days before ship | >50% |
| Field Escape Rate | % issues found post-ship | <3% |
Severity Levels
| Severity | Description | SLA Target |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Safety risk or major customer impact | ⇐3 days |
| Major | Significant rework or schedule impact | ⇐14 days |
| Moderate | Noticeable issue requiring correction | ⇐21 days |
| Minor | Small issue with minimal impact | ⇐30 days |
ECN Process
An Engineering Change Notice (ECN) is a formal document authorizing changes to engineering drawings.
When ECN is Required
- Design changes affecting fit, form, or function
- Dimension changes beyond tolerance adjustments
- Material substitutions
- Assembly method changes
ECN Workflow
- Engineer identifies need for change
- ECN document created with justification
- Affected drawings/parts identified
- Approvals obtained
- Drawings updated
- BOM updated if parts change
ECN Linkage to Redbooks
Redbooks may trigger ECNs when the fix requires drawing changes. The Has_ECN flag indicates when a redbook resulted in an ECN.
NCN Process
A Non-Conformance Notice (NCN) tracks quality issues with purchased or manufactured parts that don’t meet specifications.
NCN Workflow
- Quality issue identified with incoming/manufactured part
- NCN document created
- Part quarantined
- Disposition determined:
- Return to vendor: Send back for credit/replacement
- Rework: Fix in-house
- Use as-is: Accept deviation
- Scrap: Discard
NCN Linkage to Redbooks
Redbooks may link to NCNs when vendor quality is the root cause. The Has_NCN flag tracks this relationship.
Root Cause Categories
The Redbook Analysis system uses AI to classify root causes:
| Root Cause | Description |
|---|---|
| Design Function | Design doesn’t work as intended |
| Drawing Error | Typos, missing dimensions, wrong tolerances |
| Vendor Quality | Purchased parts don’t meet spec |
| Wiring Error | Electrical connection mistakes |
| Assembly Error | Mechanical fitment/installation issues |
| Process Change | Customer or scope changes |
| Information Gap | Missing or unclear requirements |
Systemic Issues
Root causes appearing on >50% of projects are flagged as systemic issues - indicating organizational patterns rather than project-specific problems.
Preventability Analysis
The Deep Dive analysis found that 94% of top Design Function issues were preventable through:
| Prevention Method | Examples |
|---|---|
| Design Review | Checklists, peer review, interference checks |
| Supplier Management | Better specs, incoming inspection |
| Process Control | Work instructions, training |
| Communication | Customer requirements clarification |
UniData Tables
The Redbook system uses these UniData tables:
| Table | Purpose |
|---|---|
REDBOOK.1287 | Main redbook records |
ACCOUNT.1287 | Customer accounts |
EMPLOYEE.PUBLIC.1287 | Employee lookup |
COCE | Cost centers (Primary Responsibility) |
ENG.CHG.1287 | Engineering Change Notices |
NCN.CHG.1287 | Non-Conformance Notices |
See Redbook Web - Field Mapping for complete field documentation.
Related Pages
- Redbook Web - Modern web interface
- Redbook Analysis - Analytics dashboard
- UniData API - REST API for Redbook access
- Terminology - Quality-related terms
- Engineering Process - Design workflow
- Manufacturing Process - Build process
Last updated: February 2025